The Bob Huggins Factor

Last Updated on July 5, 2011

I read every book I can get my hands on about the business of college sports. After all, I want to bring you all the best coverage, and sometimes that means taking a look at the work of other writers.

I recently finished Varsity Green: A Behind the Scenes Look at Culture and Corruption in College Athletics by Mark Yost. It was extremely accessible to the average college football fan and covers a variety of topics from the emphasis of the athlete part of student-athlete to coaching salaries, stadium costs and NCAA regulation. Although I was far from agreeing with everything in the book, I thought it was a great read. 

I wanted to share with you all my favorite part of the book. Not word for word, of course, but a story from the book that some of you may already know. It’s the part of the book I’ve talked about the most with other people and it comes right at the beginning in the Introduction.

The Introduction is called The Huggins Factor. It discusses what Bob Huggins did for Kansas State in one year as men’s basketball coach. It also illustrates a bigger topic I’m covering in my book on the business of college football, and that’s what an athletic department can do for a university overall.

The Huggins Factor is simple: a well-known coach (although for many of the wrong reasons) can create buzz for a program and with success on the court can lift up not just an athletic department but an entire university. The author notes that Bob Huggins was an odd hire for Kansas State, who had previously been known more for their academic success in the athletic department than men’s basketball program. Huggins brought with him a lot of baggage, including a 0% graduation rate for his players over the previous few seasons, a DWI conviction of his own and a reputation for being a little less than media-friendly. So why did Kansas State hire Bob Huggins to come to their academically-touted university? Money, Yost says.

Bob Huggins only stayed at Kansas State for one year. However, in his one year, he saw season ticket sales increase from 5,800 to 11,000, a sellout when you factor in the student ticket allotment. In fact, Kansas State sold out again the next year, despite Huggins’ departure. Revenue from season ticket sales more than doubled from $1.2 million to $2.7 million. Alumni donations increased by $3 million.

In addition to direct revenue from basketball, Huggins year with Kansas State impacted the entire athletic department. The men’s basketball team made their first national television appearance in decades during Bob Huggins year with them. They would go on the next year to see over half their regular season games featured on ESPN.  This is important in the Big 12, because conference distributions are based on television appearances (for non-conference games). 

In what must also be considered a result of the national exposure, Kansas State sold 30% more school apparel than in previous years. The school moved into the top 35 in sales for The Collegiate Licensing Company, moving from merely regional interest to national prominence. In addition, Huggins helped the athletic department secure a $10 million shoe and apparel deal for all varsity sports. Apparently Kansas State had been seeking a deal like this from Nike for years, but it was Bob Huggins who sealed the deal.

In the book, Kansas State Athletic Director Bob Cavello is quoted as saying: “Bob Huggins gave us a national presence, both as a basketball team and as a university.” I’d be willing to be Kansas State saw an increase in applications to the university following Bob Huggins one-year stay.

When Huggins arrived in 2006, Kansas State hadn’t been in the NCAA Tournament in ten years. Since his stay, they have been in the tournament three times. Obviously this isn’t all because of him, current coach Frank Martin deserves some credit, but it seems obvious to me that Bob Huggins started something important at Kansas State. Something they’ve been smart enough and fortunate enough to sustain ever since.

Remember when I discussed whether coaches are overpaid and the Gus Malzahn Effect? Consider this: Kansas State paid Bob Huggins just over $1 million dollars for his one year at Kansas State. How much did he bring them? I’d say somewhere around $20 million, conservatively. You’ve got $14.5 million between the increase in ticket sales and alumni donations, another $10 million for the Nike deal and then the increase in conference distribution and royalties.  Maybe the Bob Huggins Factor will convince you that some of these coaches are worth their weight in gold for athletic departments and for universities.


  • Kristi Dosh

    Kristi A. Dosh is the founder of and has served as a sports business analyst and contributor for outlets such as Forbes, ESPN, SportsBusiness Journal, Bleacher Report, SB Nation and more. She is also the author of a book on the business of college football, Saturday Millionaires. Kristi is a sought-after consultant and speaker on topics related to the business of college sports and a former practicing attorney. Click to learn more

    View all posts

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  • Alvin Stone
    July 5, 2011

    You’re taking a hugh leap to try to assign some particular brilliance or value to what Bob did at K-State in a single season. You couldn’t even give him much credit for the recruits that came in.

    There’s just not a lot of “coaching” difference in NCAA basketball. Most of the winning and losing comes in the recruiting, not the coaching. Sure, some coaches make glaring errors at inopportune times but for the most part it’s shooting percentages, rebounds, defense etc…and the wins and NCAA appearances are what put K-State back in relevance, not good ‘ol Bob. The people that are “undervalued” are the players and somehow this fact just slips on by most of us.

    Any smart coach will tell you they look better when they have better players and vice-versa, even the ones that are trying to be modest know this as fact. Sure they (coaches) play a role but definitely not as big a role as you discuss here. Maybe Bob was just lucky or maybe he’s an outstanding recruiter…who knows. But the fact that the winning has continued can likely be traced to a few outstanding players, not the coach…unless he is directly responsible for recruiting them, in which case the winning continues partly because of the coaches efforts to get them but largely because of these players.

    PAY THE PLAYERS!!! And soon, because it is going to get much more expensive the longer this charade continues.

    • kazzubbs
      July 29, 2011

      As a KSU fan I can tell you that Bob Huggins coached that team to more wins that one year at K-State. He did it with a couple new players that were like 3 star juco players. Mickael Beasley wasn’t there yet. They finished 4th in the Big12 that year with mostly the previous head coaches players. Recruiting is a part of the gig for sure.

    • gingy
      July 30, 2011

      Brad Stevens laughs at this assessment.

  • smeer
    July 6, 2011

    Huggs brought in the players. Huggs brought in Martin. While the writer may give too much credit to Huggs you don’t give him enough credit. The one year he’s there, he raises the excitement level so that the place sells out which in turn fuels more recruits wanting to play there. Who brought in the Nike deal?

    and coaching isn’t in important – it’s all about the players in the NCAAs? Our former coach Belien took a bunch of rejects and misfits to the elite 8, sweet 16 and NIT championship. Huggs took Belein’s remnant of misfits and won with them.

  • David
    July 7, 2011

    Your assertion that Huggs had a 0% graduation rate has been shown many times over to be incorrect. Please strive for accuracy.

    • Kristi Dosh
      July 7, 2011

      As I stated in the piece, the data was from the book Varsity Green, which stated he had a 0% graduation rate for some of his years at Cincinnati. I’ve done the research and it appers the NCAA reported a 0% graduation rate four times during his tenure at Cincinnatti.

      • Mill
        July 7, 2011

        Kristi – The NCAA may have reported a 0% grad rate 4 times, however they did not include transfers and JUCOS in those numbers. Huggs’ Cincy teams were mainly JUCOS and transfers. So the NCAA are a bit misleading.

  • Mike
    July 29, 2011

    I agree that folks read too much into the low grad rates at UC. He had guys leaving early for the NBA left and right, as well as a ton of JUCOs. The Men’s Basketball APR at WVU has been excellent since Huggins came on, with the latest APR at 995.

  • Dave E
    July 30, 2011

    Another point on Huggs’ graduation rates. I heard Huggs himself address that one day. He said “Why does anyone go to college? To help them make a better living to provide for their family. If a young man can leave college early for the NBA and make millions of dollars, hasn’t he accomplished that objective?” He had a few of these at Cincy that contributed to a poor graduation rate.

    I thought your article was very good and well-written. K-State does have a better basketball history than mentioned though. Yes, I know you were quoting the book.

  • Don Christensen
    July 31, 2011

    If Bob Huggins had such a positive effect at K-State, then the antithesis of the Bob Huggins Factor at KSU is the Trent Johnson Factor at LSU.